Legal Opinion

Hinds v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1959No. 35103PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision on November 9, 1957. From a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

Appellants do not question their liability or the facts concerning the accident itself. Their assignments of error relate to the competency of the evidence relied upon to prove the nature and permanency of the respondent’s injury and the amount of damages suffered thereby.

The respondent’s principal injury is diplopia or double vision. The question raised by the assignments of error is whether there was competent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petersen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lyster v. MetzgerWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Matthias v. Lehn & Fink Products Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Smith v. Ernst Hardware Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Kennedy v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API