Legal Opinion
Leo Villarreal v. United States of America
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 10, 2025No. 5:25-cv-05084Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION LEO VILLARREAL, 5:25-CV-05084-RAL Movant, OPINION AND ORDER SCREENING AND VS. DISMISSING § 2255 MOTION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Movant Leo Villarreal filed a pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 1. Villarreal has submitted two supplements to his § 2255 motion. Docs. 4,5. This is Villarreal’s second § 2255 motion seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, but Villarreal has not obtained the required authorization from the United States Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Monroe Evans, Also Known as Ty, Also Known as DaddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Wakinyan McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.