Legal Opinion
Wright v. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Human Services
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 17, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00253Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 SAMANTHA WRIGHT, Case No. 3:24-cv-00253-MMD-CLB 7 Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 9 PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE HUMAN SERVICES, 10 Respondent. 11 12 I. SUMMARY 13 This habeas matter is before the Court for initial review of Petitioner Samantha 14 Wright’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1 (“Petition”)) under 28 U.S.C. 15 § 2241 under the rules governing § 2254 cases.1 The Court summarily dismisses the 16 petition for lack of jurisdiction. 17 II. DISCUSSION 18 Under Habeas Rule 4, the assigned judge must examine the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.