Legal Opinion
United States v. Voice
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 17, 2009No. CR. 08-30101-01-KESPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Harold George Voice, is charged with one court of failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Docket 1. Voice moves to dismiss the indictment filed against him based upon the fact that the Sexual Offender Registration Notification Act (SOR-NA) is unconstitutional in several respects.
The court referred the motion to dismiss the indictment to the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommends that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011