Legal Opinion

State v. Watson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1991No. CR 91-149PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellee Frances Maudine Watson was charged in Count I of an information with “being a parent, guardian, or person legally charged with the care or custody of a child, she recklessly failed to take action to prevent the abuse of Daniel Toric who is less than eleven years old.” Arkansas Code Ann. § 5-27-221(a)(l) (1987). Ms. Watson filed a motion to dismiss Count I, alleging that the state could not prove she was a parent, guardian or person legally charged with the care of Daniel Toric.

At a hearing on the motion, counsel for the state made a proffer of the evidence the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamb & Rhodes v. HowtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Gland-O-Lac Co. v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Healey & Roth v. HuieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Hardcastle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. State v. JamisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Nance v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. State v. Circuit Court of Lincoln CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API