Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentBenton, Judge
The principal opinion acts as if the Missouri precedents — admittedly on all fours with this case — are trivial. In fact, the principal opinion is contrary to a long line of cases, to key concepts of Missouri administrative law, and to the rules of statutory construction.
I. History of “Filing” Rules in Worker’s Compensation Cases
Shortly after the enactment of the Worker’s Compensation law, the Kansas City *344Court of Appeals, in 1931, reviewed the predecessor to § 287.480, and held that an application for review “received” by the commission after the statutory period for appeal may be “refused…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Rothschild v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Springfield Park Central Hospital v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State Ex Rel. LeFevre v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Long v. City of HannibalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.