Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 19, 1991No. 73730Published

1DissentBenton, Judge

The principal opinion acts as if the Missouri precedents — admittedly on all fours with this case — are trivial. In fact, the principal opinion is contrary to a long line of cases, to key concepts of Missouri administrative law, and to the rules of statutory construction.

I. History of “Filing” Rules in Worker’s Compensation Cases

Shortly after the enactment of the Worker’s Compensation law, the Kansas City *344Court of Appeals, in 1931, reviewed the predecessor to § 287.480, and held that an application for review “received” by the commission after the statutory period for appeal may be “refused…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Metro Auto Auction v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  2. Rothschild v. State Tax Com'n of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Springfield Park Central Hospital v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. LeFevre v. StubbsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Long v. City of HannibalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API