Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 2008No. 06FE0017MS; A135311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this criminal case, defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for five counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and one count of unlawful sexual penetration in the second degree. At sentencing, based on its findings relating to the circumstances of the commission of the offenses, the trial court ordered that the sentences on certain convictions be served consecutively to the sentences on the other convictions. See ORS 137.123(2). On appeal, defendant contends, as he did below, that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences on the basis of its own factual findings, as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API