Legal Opinion
Dash v. Dash
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 1946No. Appeal, 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
In this divorce case the master recommended a decree; the respondent filed exceptions to the master’s report; the court overruled the exceptions, approved the report, and granted the final decree. Respondent has appealed.
“The rule is firmly established that the findings of fact of a master in divorce are not entitled to the weight ordinarily accorded the findings of an auditor or master in equity. [Rommel v. Rommel, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 511; Auerbach v. Auerbach, 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 369; Rinoldo v. Rinoldo, 125 Pa. Superior Ct. 323; 189 A. 566.] Notwithstanding the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rommel v. RommelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Rinoldo v. RinoldoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Auerbach v. AuerbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rood v. RoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Horn v. HornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowden v. BowdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Cook v. Cook, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1971
- Cunningham v. Cunningham, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971
- Krogh v. Belanger, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1956
- Proios v. Proios, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1951