Contest of a Certain Special Election v. Special Road Districts Nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD M. DAVIS, Judge Pro Tern.
The appellants challenge a two-thirds affirmative vote requirement in the statute authorizing the issuance of special road district bonds. The trial court rejected the challenge, and we affirm its decision.
The appellant special road districts were organized in 1973 pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 18-251 et seq. The districts are located in the Fountain Hills area of Maricopa County. The four districts have consolidated and operate through a joint board of trustees. In 1974 they sought and received .from the voters within their districts the right to issue…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Opinion No. (1996), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1996