Legal Opinion

People v. Barclift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*195The trial court properly denied defense counsel’s request for an unredacted copy of the undercover’s daily activity report since it did not constitute Rosario material. The undercover’s direct testimony concerned the details of the pre-7:30.A.M. preparation meeting with other officers and the post-ll:30 a.m. buy and bust operation resulting in defendant’s arrest; he never testified as to any other drug buys that may have occurred on other stops made by the officers that morning. Defendant contends, for example, that "if the report indicated that the previous stops had failed to result in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FeerickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. BambergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. People v. AlejoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API