Legal Opinion

Ho-Chunk Nation v. Money Centers of America, Inc.

Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court

Decided December 28, 2010No. CV 10-54Published

1Opinion of the Court

*310ORDER

AMANDA L. ROCKMAN, Associate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court must determine whether or not to dismiss the plaintiffs claims and/or the defendants’ counterclaims in the instant action. The Court dismisses several of the claims and counterclaims for lack of jurisdiction, as they do not “arisfe] under the Constitution, laws, customs, and traditions of the Ho-Chunk Nation.” Ho-Chunk Nation Constitution, Art. VJI, § 5(a). However, some of the claims and counterclaims do “aris[e] under the Constitution, laws, customs, and traditions of the Ho-Chunk Nation.” Id. The Court has jurisdiction over…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel., Walter M. Drake v. Norden Systems, Inc., and United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Ho-Chunk Nation v. B & K Builders, Inc.Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 2001
  3. Ho-Chunk Nation v. LangHo-Chunk Nation Trial Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API