Legal Opinion

J.M.P.U. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 5, 2003No. 3D03-463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s Order of Contempt, finding appellant J.M.P.U in indirect criminal contempt and sentencing him to ninety days in jail. We quash the trial court’s Order of Contempt. The record reflects that J.M.P.U. was not given specifics as to the acts which constituted the alleged contempt. In addition, there was no information in the Rule to Show Cause informing J.M.P.U. that he was subject to possible criminal penalties. The Rule to Show Cause thus does not meet the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.840;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Benarroch v. CrawfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Kersh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Pryor v. WilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. MarinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Maher v. JuniorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. JMPU v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Maher v. JuniorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API