Merrill v. . McMinn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It is very certain that the objection would have been held good had it not been for the act of the General Assembly at its Session of 1844-5, curing defects in the official bonds of certain officers therein named. The circumstance that the constable's bond was taken by a court composed of only three magistrates makes no difference, since the passage of the aforesaid act of Assembly. S. v. Pool, 27 N.C. 105.
PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.
Cited: Comrs. v. Magnin, 86 N.C. 289.(346)
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Jordan v. PoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
- Commissioners of Wake County v. MagninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882