Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McNaughton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 1977No. 712PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court incorrectly permitted the introduction of written hearsay evidence on which it based its adjudication of delinquency as defined by the Juvenile Act.1 We agree and, therefore, remand for another hearing.

*305On March 30, 1976, appellant, age thirteen, appeared in Juvenile Court in the Court oí Common Pleas of Allegheny County in response to a petition filed by his probation officer. The petition alleged that on March 5, 1976, while appellant was at Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic for psychiatric evaluation,2 Dr. Solmani, appellant’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Holmes' AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Commonwealth v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SevilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Spotts v. ReidellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Folger ex rel. Folger v. DuganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Ganster v. Western Pennsylvania Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. In the Interest of DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API