Legal Opinion

Segler v. City Council of Americus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1955No. 35396Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

Under the contract set out hereinabove, Tanner-Brice agreed to purchase, and Acme agreed to sell merchandise from an agreed list of articles at an agreed price, the exact articles not being specified except as “merchandise to be displayed” on Acme’s rack, loaned to and placed in the store. This rack was serviced at regular intervals, and the “merchandise to be displayed” was replaced or changed according to indications from sales made during the interval as to which articles were moving and which were not. The defendant was a truck driver for Acme, with instructions to make deliveries. His…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newburger & Brother v. HoytSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Kirkpatrick v. City of ConyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API