Legal Opinion
Kite v. Marshall
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 18, 1980No. Civ. A. H-78-1171, H-80-313PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CIRE, District Judge.
This action presents a constitutional challenge to the “summer camp rule” adopted by the Defendant University Interscholastic League (UIL). Subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). The Plaintiffs ask this Court to hold Article VIII, Section 21 of the UIL’s Constitution and Contest Rules unconstitutional. That rule provides:
“Training Camps.—Any student who attends a special athletic training camp in football, basketball, or volleyball shall be ineligible for a period of one year from the date he enrolls in the camp in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bailey v. TrubyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Kite v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Adamek v. Pennsylvania InterschoLastic Athletic Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Blue v. University Interscholastic LeagueDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
- Haverkamp v. Unified School Dist. No. 380District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.