Legal Opinion
Dunkin v. Lamb
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 30, 1980No. Civ. LV 79-2 RDFPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROGER D. FOLEY, District Judge.
The defendants have moved this Court for a summary judgment as to each defend ant pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the ground that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that the actions and inactions of the defendants deprived him of his civil rights in violation of Title 42, U.S.C., § 1983. He claims his constitutional rights were violated on three separate occasions.
The first…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Howard Smith Bennett v. Albert Passic, Sheriff, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Grady Carroll Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Donald D. Hesselgesser v. William J. Reilly, Sheriff of Spokane County, Washington, E. Byron Franz, and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Roberts v. HockerNevada Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Timothy J. Judd v. George A. Vose, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Utt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Sheriff, Clark County v. BermanNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WaggonerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.