Legal Opinion
SEDITA, III, FRANK A. v. SACHA, MARK A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 5, 2012No. CA 12-00594PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Although petitioners appeal from an order that purportedly “denied” their petition, they concede in their brief that Supreme Court “effectively granted the relief requested in the Verified Petition” and seek only to have certain language stricken from the order. Where, as here, the appealing parties have by their own concession “obtained the full relief sought, [they have] no grounds for appeal . . . This is so even where [they] disagree[ ] with the particular findings, rationale or the opinion supporting the order . . . , or where [they] failed to prevail on all the issues that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parochial Bus Systems, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Turner v. CanaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Cholowsky v. CivilettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- State v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SpearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SpearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Rochester City Sch. Dist. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. SpearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SpearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.