Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1996No. Docket 177465PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The Attorney General appeals portions of a June 30, 1995, order of the Michigan Public Service Commission, which allows Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (Mich Con) to include gains and losses it may incur from hedging in the gas futures market in its gas cost recovery (gcr) factors and which changes the method by which Mich Con credits or surcharges customers for the difference between the actual cost of gas and its projected cost as embodied in the gcr factors. We affirm.
i
MCL 460.6h(l)(b); MSA 22.13(6h)(l)(b) created a mechanism whereby the psc may include a "gas cost recovery clause” in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michigan Gas Utilities v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Federal Armored Service, Inc v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Attorney General v. Public Service Commission No 1Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- Champion's Auto Ferry, Inc v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ass'n of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re Parole of FranciosiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.