State v. Hendrix
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
—Candice Hendrix, a juvenile, appeals a decision that she was guilty of second degree escape. She claims there was insufficient evidence to show that she escaped from a “detention facility,” a requirement of the second degree escape statute. We agree.
Because the State has failed to fulfill its burden to show that Hendrix was either “arrested for, charged with or convicted of an offense,” or that she was “charged with being or adjudicated to be a juvenile offender,” as defined by RCW 9A.76.010, we reverse. She properly concedes that she violated the third degree escape statute. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Rettkowski v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BreshonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. EichelbergerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.