Legal Opinion

Kahnweiler v. Pfitsch

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

It is clear that the collapsible boats were never tendered in such condition as to require acceptance. Assuming that “new” meant no more than “unused,” they were not “in first-class condition,” because the canvas was torn, the kopak fenders ripped, the decks broken, and some of the gunwales staved in. Moreover, there is unquestioned evidence as to at least three of them that the inspector would not pass them, and indeed it would have been most improper for him to do so. It is argued that the libelant could have made all necessary repairs, and was willing to make…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayer & Lage, Inc. v. Prince Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cioffi v. New Zealand Shipping Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API