Washington State Legislature v. Lowry
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
(dissenting) — No amount of judicial circumlocution should be allowed to undo what the people have done through exercise of their ultimate and most fundamental organic power to amend the constitution. In the form of the 62nd amendment the voters repealed the Governor’s line item veto and substituted a much more limited power in its place: the power to veto a whole bill, an entire "section” or an "appropriation item.” But the majority would have us believe it thinks better than the people who amended the constitution, and assures us it is much fairer than the Legislature in the discharge of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.