Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lane v. Pipeline Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 23, 1969No. 38340Published

1DissentErvin, Chief Justice

The Judge of Industrial Claims, with the Commission affirming, appears to have improperly apportioned out of claimant’s compensation benefits a percentage for a non-disabling prior disease or condition, which prior to the injury had not affected his wage earning capacity as a manual laborer. This apportionment was made contrary to the decisions in Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission (Fla.), 196 So.2d 748, and Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (Fla.), 201 So.2d 731, and other cases.

From the record it appears that for three years prior to his compensable back injury in this case claimant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ball v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Evans v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967
  4. Fisher v. Carroll Daniel Fisher Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  5. Robinette v. E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API