Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 2007No. 2D06-3288Published

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Judge.

Willie Charles Dixon appeals the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the postconviction court should have dismissed the motion as legally insufficient, we reverse and remand with an instruction to do so.

On May 31, 2006, Dixon filed his motion to correct illegal sentence, claiming that his sentence did not effectuate the intent of his plea bargain. In summarily denying the motion, the postconviction court found Dixon’s claim was not cognizable in a rule 3.800(a) motion because he did not allege his sentence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stathas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Livingston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API