Legal Opinion

Stith v. Milwaukee Guardian Ins., Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1988No. 13335PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s decision granting plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. We reverse.

On September 22, 1982, defendant, Milwaukee Guardian Insurance, Inc. (“Guardian”), issued plaintiff, Joseph J. Stith, a six-month renewable automobile insurance policy. Stith continued to renew the Guardian policy through the March 22, 1985 to September 22, 1985 period. However, not having received a premium payment for the succeeding period, Guardian sent Stith notice on September 24, 1985 that if payment was not received by October 5, 1985, the policy would terminate. On September…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taxter v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Songer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Allstate Insurance v. Republic InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bondex International, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  2. Majernicek v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Mitchell v. Motorists Mut., Unpublished Decision (8-4-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Ohio Farmers Insurance v. Estate of BraceOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Turner v. Progressive Specialty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API