Legal Opinion

George H. Ruth Candy Co. v. Curtiss Candy Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1931No. 2762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeneoot, Presiding Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, reversing a decision of the examiner of trade-mark interferences, and holding that appellant is not entitled to the registration for which it has applied.

Appellant, on June 2, 1926, filed an application for registration of a mark comprising the words “ Ruth’s Home Run ” and the name “ George H. £ Babe ’ Ruth,” the latter being stated to constitute the signature of George H. Ruth, who is well known as a baseball player. In the application it is stated that no claim is made to the exclusive…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merrick v. Sharp & Dohme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  2. Bellbrook Dairies, Inc. (Edlo, Inc., Assignee, Substituted) v. Hawthorn-Mellody Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Englander v. Continental Distilling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  4. Bellbrook Dairies, Inc. (Edlo, Inc., Assignee, Substituted) v. Bowman Dairy CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API