Legal Opinion

Harwood v. Creel

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1875PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a writ of error and supersedeas to a judgrnei~t of the circuit court of Wood county, granted on the petition of Thomas H. Creel, B. H. Foley, Jr., and T. H. Creel, Jr.. the defendants below. The plainti±~ was George L. Harwood. The judgment from which the appeal was taken was rendered on the 8th day of December, 1873. The other material facts will be found stated in the opinion of the Court.

Read the full summary

This was a writ of error and supersedeas to a judgrnei~t of the circuit court of Wood county, granted on the petition of Thomas H. Creel, B. H. Foley, Jr., and T. H. Creel, Jr.. the defendants below. The plainti±~ was George L. Harwood. The judgment from which the appeal was taken was rendered on the 8th day of December, 1873. The other material facts will be found stated in the opinion of the Court. The Hon. James M. Jackson, judge of said circuit court, presided at the hearing of the motion below.

1Opinion of the Court

HaymoNd, President:

On the 27th day of October, 1856, plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant Thomas H. Creel, for $i 00.95 with interest from the 27th day of October, 1856, till paid and costs, in the circuit court of the county of `Wood. Upon this judgment several writs of flerifacia& were~ issued and duly returned "no property found." Af- *580terwards, and on the 1st day of November, 1872, another "writ of- fieri facias was duly issued upon said judgment and placed in the hands of W. J. Hill, sheriff of said county, to be levied. This last named writ was made returnable on the 1st…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. McCulloughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paine v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
  2. Paine v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
  3. Paine v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API