People v. Dominick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), rendered November 15, 1995, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, *724viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. . GaimariNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. GarafoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dominick v. GreinerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- People v. HardieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998