Legal Opinion
Neal v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1984No. 13117PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant (“Neal”) appeals from a judgment denying his motion under Rule 27.26 1 to vacate his conviction of selling marihuana, § 195.020, RSMo 1978, for which he was sentenced to 45 years’ imprisonment.
The conviction — a result of trial by jury — was affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Neal, 624 S.W.2d 182 (Mo.App.1981).
In the instant appeal, Neal briefs seven points. As appears infra, we are unable to rule on one of them (point IV) because of the lack of a finding by the trial court on an essential issue. This necessitates remand for that limited purpose. Hamilton v. State, 490 S.W.2d 363,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. SkinnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. AlbaneseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.