Legal Opinion

Spitzfaden v. Daigle Welding Service, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1992No. 91-CA-2659PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEES, Judge.

Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York [hereinafter “Fidelity”] appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff, Gerald A. Spitzfaden.

On July 20, 1987, plaintiff filed suit against Daigle Welding Service, Inc. [hereinafter “Daigle”] and Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. [hereinafter “Chevron”] seeking damages for injuries caused by his slip and fall on a vessel. In his initial petition, plaintiff asserted that on January 11, 1987, he was employed by Daigle and was injured while working on board a barge owned and operated by Daigle and/or Chevron. Plaintiff alleged both a Jones Act…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roy Hebron v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Kizer v. LillySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. Luper v. Sea Crew Service Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Hardin v. Conoco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1989
  5. Hardin v. ConocoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Burlington Insurance Company v. Houston Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API