Gibbons v. New Castle Area School District
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Palladino:
I dissent.
The result of the majority’s decision is that, whenever a school district realigns its istaff, -senior teachers and administrators will have the right to choose to fill any position for which they are certificated and which is being filled by an employee with less seniority. The essence of this result is that whenever a realignment is necessary, employees with greater seniority will be able to “bump” less senior employees in order to suit the senior employee’s desires without any regard to the overall impact on the school district or the other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. Darby School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Welsko v. Foster Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Platko v. Laurel Highlands School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Abington School Board v. PittengerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Andresky v. West Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.