Legal Opinion

Bragdon v. Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 29, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, C. J.

This is an action of debt (R. S., Chap. 78, Sec. 27) to recover the amount of a pecuniary legacy under a will proved and allowed by the Probate Court. It is brought up on an agreed statement of facts, with exhibits attached, upon exceptions by the legatee to judgment of “plaintiff nonsuit,” together with a stipulation showing, with other facts not requiring recital here, that defendant, Edward Smith, otherwise known as Edward L. Smith, is the duly qualified executor of the decedent, Hoyt L. Smith, that the Warrant and Inventory returned in said estate showed an appraisal value of decedent’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farwell v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  2. Esty v. CurrierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Additon v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  4. Strolberg v. StrolbergNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Chapman v. ChickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cantillon v. WalkerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  2. Bourgeois v. SpragueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Langille v. NortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Langille v. NortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly & Davis v. KohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API