Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Shorter

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1967No. 4294PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The facts in this appeal, which arises from an adjudication of appellant for contempt, are not in conflict.

As attorney for the defendant in a criminal case, appellant was scheduled to appear with his client for sentencing before a trial judge in the Court of General Sessions on a Friday morning. When the case was called shortly after ten o’clock, appellant’s client had not yet appeared. The court, therefore, granted counsel’s request that he be excused to attend to other matters pending in the United States District Court, but with the specific understanding that he return at 11:30 - a. m.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re SaulDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Grant Sykes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. Kandel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Murphy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API