Legal Opinion

State v. McSloy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1953No. 9269PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

Defendant has appealed from a judgment following the verdict of the jury finding him guilty of the infamous crime against nature and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

By several specifications of error defendant contends that the information states more than one offense. The question was raised by demurrer, objection to the introduction of testimony, motion to elect and by motion in arrest of judgment. If the information charges more than one offense it is ground for demurrer. R. C. M. 1947, sec. 94-6703, subd. 3.

The information charges that defendant is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. State v. SearleMontana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. BiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. The People v. PondIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LawrenceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. FaulknerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. LeMayMontana Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API