Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Hutchinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 2003No. 15-99-14554; A116876Published

1DissentEdmonds, J.

I agree with the majority opinion in all respects except with its holding that the parties’ agreement that accrued spousal support can be retroactively modified to December 1, 2000, conflicts with ORS 107.135(6) and therefore is unenforceable.

ORS 107.135(6) provides, in pertinent part,

“[T]he court does not have the power to set aside, alter or modify such decree, or any portion thereof, that provides for any payment of money, either for minor children or the support of a party, that has accrued prior to the filing of such motion.”

The parties’ agreement provides that

“[i]f Husband fails to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In re Marriage of PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API