Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Warden of the Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 24, 1962No. [App. No. 3, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under the U.P.C.P.A., Code (1961 Supp.), Art. 27, §§ 64SA-645J. According to the application, Reynolds and two codefendants, Middleton and Hughey, all pleaded guilty to charges of grand larceny and breaking and entering. At the trial, Reynolds and Middleton each asked for and received court appointed counsel. Each of them was sentenced to a term of five years. Hughey, it is alleged, declined appointed counsel and was sentenced to four and a half years.

The single point pressed at the hearing below and raised here is that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Merchant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Reid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Wilson v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Kaylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Gee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API