Michael v. Wenning
New York Marine Court
Motion to set aside precept for costs issued by defendant after a final order of discontinuance without costs.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
An order of discontinuance terminates the action in which it is made, and works a dissolution of any provisional remedy granted therein (Hope v. Acker, 7 Abb. Pr. 308). It is, in short, a final determination of the rights of the parties in an action (Crockett v. Smith, 14 Abb. Pr. 62). If the discontinuance be with costs or on payment of costs, the defendant may have the amount thereof taxed and enter judgment therefor, but if the discontinuance be without costs, the order operales as a final adjudiciation that the defendant is not entitled to any costs. The effect of the final order or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hope v. AckerThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
- Crockett v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1860