Legal Opinion

Prauner v. Battle Creek Cooperative Creamery

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1962No. 35092PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an action to enjoin the construction and operation of a bulk petroleum plant. The trial court granted a permanent injunction and the defendant appealed.

The question involved is whether construction and operation of a bulk petroleum plant, in conformity with the rules and regulations of the State Fire Marshal, which plant will'be located outside the corporate limits of the village of Battle Creek but across the street from the residences of the plaintiffs which are within the corporate limits of the village, necessarily creates a nuisance, where the character of the neighborhood is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Beisel v. CrosbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Sarraillon v. StevensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Brown v. EasterdayNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Botsch v. Leigh Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Burgess v. Omahawks Radio Control OrganizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Daugherty v. Ashton Feed & Grain Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cline v. Franklin Pork, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API