Commonwealth v. Asamoah
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
HUDOCK, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered after a judge, sitting without a jury, found Appellant guilty, at a trial de novo, of the offense of “loitering” in contravention of an ordinance of the City of York, Pennsylvania. 1 We reverse.
¶2 The trial court has explained the facts underlying this appeal in the following apt manner:
Officer Scott Edward Nadzom of the York City Police Department observed [Appellant] and another individual standing on the sidewalk in a “high drug area” in York City, [Appellant] holding currency in his right hand, the other…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- City of Alliance v. CarboneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BrandonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Crews v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Aspen Enterprises v. Thomas, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.