Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Asamoah

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered after a judge, sitting without a jury, found Appellant guilty, at a trial de novo, of the offense of “loitering” in contravention of an ordinance of the City of York, Pennsylvania. 1 We reverse.

¶2 The trial court has explained the facts underlying this appeal in the following apt manner:

Officer Scott Edward Nadzom of the York City Police Department observed [Appellant] and another individual standing on the sidewalk in a “high drug area” in York City, [Appellant] holding currency in his right hand, the other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. City of Alliance v. CarboneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. BrandonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Crews v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Aspen Enterprises v. Thomas, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API