Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 4, 1998No. 97-1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.

In August, 1992, Charles E. Vickers, Jr., (Vickérs), an employee insured under an ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., group policy covering, within limits, accidental death, was fatally injured in a one-car auto mobile crash in Arizona. Plaintiff executrix sued in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and was awarded the death benefit and attorney’s fees on a motion for summary judgment. Defendant Boston Mutual Life Insurance Company (Company), claiming the death was not covered by the policy, appeals. We affirm.

The Facts

Vickers,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Gracey v. ReigleSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Bohaker v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Gay v. Stonebridge Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. I v. Services of America, Inc. v. Inn Development & Management, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  4. Salcedo v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
  5. Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API