Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Pike. Tried before the Hon. T. L. Borom. The appellant, Ennis Wright, was indicted, tried and convi cited for an assault with a weapon. The facts of the case necessary to an understanding of the decision on the present appeal, are sufficiently stated in the opinion. cited Carlisle v. Kill drew, 70 Ala 401; Olmstead v. Crook, 89 Ala. 228.

1Opinion of the CourtTyson, J.

Under the act establishing the criminal court for the county of Pike (Acts, 1888-9, p 631),' the court is required to hold its regular terms monthly. These terms begin on the first Monday in each month. This case was tried at the October term 1902 and on the 16th day of that month, a day during the term; an order was entered upon the minutes of the court allowing defendant thirty days to file his bill of exceptions. On the 11th day of November following, a day during the regular term held for that month, another order was entered upon the minutes of the court extending the time for the filing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blake v. HarlanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moss v. MoselySupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API