Legal Opinion

Loucks' Assigned Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1915No. Appeal, No. 40PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1915, by Horace E. Smyser and Henry K. Smyser, Executors of the will of Michael Smyser, deceased; Lizzie B. Fulton, Executrix of the will of Samuel M. Fulton, deceased, and George W. Fry, from decree of G. P. York Go., directing distribution of the assigned estate of Edwin W. Loucks. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Wanner, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1915, by Horace E. Smyser and Henry K. Smyser, Executors of the will of Michael Smyser, deceased; Lizzie B. Fulton, Executrix of the will of Samuel M. Fulton, deceased, and George W. Fry, from decree of G. P. York Go., directing distribution of the assigned estate of Edwin W. Loucks. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Wanner, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Error assigned was in dismissing the exceptions and in confirming the report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

The appellants here complain of the action of the *569court below in dismissing their exceptions to the report of an auditor. In its opinion the court says that the auditor rejected appellants’ claim on the ground that it had been paid in full in a former distribution of part-of this assigned estate. After reciting the proceedings before the first auditor, and pointing out in detail the manner in which the claim of appellants had been adjudicated, and paid in full, the court notes that exceptions were filed to the adjudication by appellants, all of which were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowers' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newhall AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API