Legal Opinion
State v. Hageman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 13, 1909No. 17,626PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Charles I-Iageman, Jack Robbins, and John Rosotti, were convicted of keeping a grog shop without a license, and defendants Robbins and Rosetti apply for writs of certiorari and prohibition.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
In the petition of the applicants for the writs mentioned they allege that:
“They, with Charles A. Hageman, were jointly indicted in the First judicial district court in and for the parish of Caddo, La., in two cases numbered, respectively, 10,854 and 10,856 on the docket of said court, and both entitled ‘State of Louisiana v. Chas. A. Hageman et al.’ That the offense charged in said indictment was ‘unlawfully did retail intoxicating liquors, without previously obtaining a license from the police jury of the parish of Caddo or the municipal authorities of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schulherr v. BordeauxMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
- In re State CensusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. CuculluSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State ex rel. Hart v. HicksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DonatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- State v. DunsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.