Legal Opinion

Saum v. Hine

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1936No. 26164PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

There seems to be no dispute over the material facts in this case. Emma L. Saum was the owner of the first mortgage covering certain real property in Muskogee, Okla. T. S. Hine was the owner of the second mortgage thereon. The conditions of the mortgages had been breached by failure to pay. During the latter part of 1931, Mrs. Saum consulted her real estate agent, John Philpin, with reference to her mortgage. At that time apparently the property was not worth sufficient to pay the mortgage of Mrs. Saum; in addition there had accumulated several hundred dollars of delinquent taxes. The holder…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Richardson v. HockenhullIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. McCreary v. CoggeshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  4. Edgerton v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Shaver v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Chickasha, Oklahoma v. NathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. J. A. Tobin Construction Co. v. Grandview BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Citizens Security Bank of Bixby v. CourtneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Anthony v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API