Legal Opinion

Lee v. Hollister

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barr, D. J.

This is a suit brought by the assignee in bankruptcy of Hudson Hollister to set aside two conveyances made to his wife, Mary H. Hollister, in January, 1874.

The facts proven in the record are briefly these:

Mary McConnell married Hudson Hollister on the tenth of June, 1850. Her father was then dead, and she had inherited one-fifth of his estate, consisting of land, negroes, and some money, estimated to be worth $50,000.

There was no antenuptial agreement; but it is clearly proven that Hudson Hollister, before he received any part of his wife’s estate, promised her that if she would…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Humes v. ScruggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. McLaughlin v. Bank of PotomacSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Lowry v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
  5. Pacific Railroad v. MaguireSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City, Mo. v. RockefellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Bowman v. AndresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  3. Patterson v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API