Legal Opinion
Curran v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 28, 1906No. 44PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. '
1Per curiam
This case was heard without a jury, and no objection is made in this court, if any objection were now available, to the findings of fact by the learned circuit judge. Upon these findings, it seems clear to us that his conclusions of law inevitably follow, and we think it superfluous to restate in other language a course of reasoning with which we are in full accord.
The findings of fact, as originally found, are as follows:
“This is an action for damages for breach of a contract, bronght by Henry B. Smith and William D. Benham, of Bay City, Mich., against Orville P. Cur-ran, Jr., and Curtis G.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Shappirio v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Blair v. United States Ex Rel. Gregory-HoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Horton v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Quaker Metal Co. v. Standard Tank Car Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1923
- C. W. Denning & Co. v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.