Hoover v. McFarland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the ease as above).
Appellant complains because the trial court, over his objection thereto on the ground that it was leading and called for the conclusion of the witness, permitted appellee while testifying in her own behalf to answer (in the affirmative) a question propounded to her by one of her attorneys as follows: “Has your husband and you all been in possession of the particular piece of land between Tollett’ Creek and the ravine ever since your husband bought it?” It is not clear under the rule applicable (International & G. N. Railway Co. v. Dalwigh, 92…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Satterwhite v. RosserTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. DalwighTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Lott v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. PuenteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- H. E. Butt Grocery Co. v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Wiggins v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947