Bonner v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHodges, Justice
I concur with the views expressed by the majority with regard to its analysis of the trial judge’s discretion in overruling appellants’ motion for a legislative continuance. However, because my opinion of the propriety of the trial judge’s allowance of appellants’ attorney to withdraw voluntarily is at variance with that of the majority, I dissent.
The Oklahoma Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-lll(A)(2), 5 O.S.1981 Ch. 1, App. 3, provides:
“In any event, a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Barrett v. GagnonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Evans v. Scottsdale Plumbing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Finch v. WALLBERG DREDGING COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.