Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bonner v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1985No. 61939Published

1DissentHodges, Justice

I concur with the views expressed by the majority with regard to its analysis of the trial judge’s discretion in overruling appellants’ motion for a legislative continuance. However, because my opinion of the propriety of the trial judge’s allowance of appellants’ attorney to withdraw voluntarily is at variance with that of the majority, I dissent.

The Oklahoma Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-lll(A)(2), 5 O.S.1981 Ch. 1, App. 3, provides:

“In any event, a lawyer shall not withdraw from employment until he has taken reasonable steps to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Barrett v. GagnonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Evans v. Scottsdale Plumbing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. Finch v. WALLBERG DREDGING COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API