Legal Opinion

Scholen v. Guaranty Trust Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lehman, Ch. J.

The defendant made a motion pursuant to rule 106, subdivision 5, of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Upon that motion the court may, of course, consider only the sufficiency of the allegations contained in the complaint. In this opinion we treat the allegations of the complaint as established facts.

The plaintiff seeks damages alleged to have been caused - to legatees named in the last will and testament of Frederick B. Aebly by the failure of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Estate of ReissNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  3. Snyder v. GuiderNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Tracy v. Wm. J. Kline & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Ardisco Financial Corp. v. de MargouliesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API