Legal Opinion

Curry v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1969No. 41852PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This appeal is presented by John R. Curry, plaintiff in error, a plaintiff in the trial court, against Cletis Hill,‘defendant in error, as defendant below. The parties will hereinafter be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiff is the owner of a tract of land lying on one side of the Kiamichi River which runs through the southeastern part of Oklahoma. The defendant is the lessee of the land directly across the river from a portion of plaintiff’s land.

Plaintiff’s petition prayed for injunctive relief against the defendant to prohibit the “defendant from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elder v. DelcourSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Irion v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF CHOCTAW CO. v. SchuesslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Baker v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. J.J.N.P. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Wildlife ResourcesUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API